What Job Seekers Can Learn From Barack Obama

The election is over and Barack Obama will be our next President. His campaign demonstrated a few techniques that any job seeker can employ to improve their job search.

Positioning Statement

What was the cornerstone of the Obama campaign – the one word that summarizes the reason to vote for Barack Obama? I doubt anyone has confusion here. We've heard "Change" so many times that this one word has come to represent everything about the Obama campaign.

When you are considered for a position by an employer, what word or phrase will represent everything you offer? You should develop a theme that a hiring manager can clearly understand and articulate.

Contrast this with John McCain. The one word that saturated his campaign was "Maverick." Although the use of this word had many similarities to Obama's use of "Change," it didn't resonate with voters. The reason for this is the complexity of the image. Obama means change, people are unhappy and change will make them happy. McCain is a maverick, a maverick will make changes, the people are unhappy and the changes will make them happy.

It's essentially the same argument, but for Obama, it's clearer. This clarity translated into greater trust, and more votes.

Benefits

Which candidate offered the hiring managers (all of us) more value and greater benefits?

Both candidates made a lot of campaign promises. Obama's were more specific in many cases. For example, his tax policy consistently focused on: "Cut taxes for 95 percent of workers and their families with a tax cut of $500 for workers or $1,000 for working couples."

Hiring managers make decisions based on which job seeker will provide more value to them and to their company. A $500 tax cut is not significant for most people, but it is a tangible, specific benefit.

In your interviews, you need to demonstrate what value you can provide. The best way to do this is to show how you have provided value to past employers. For example, "at ABC company, I implemented a new material handling system that improved our processes and saved the company $250,000 per year." For a hiring manager that wants to improve their material handling processes, this candidate would make a very strong impression.

Storytelling

Political conventions, speeches and debates have developed a consistent strategy used by both parties – Storytelling. How many times have we watched a candidate parade a series of people, telling the story of each person and how they will help that person if elected.

The point of this strategy is to create a very clear image of what the candidate will deliver and make a strong personal connection. Political candidates have learned that people don't vote for logical, factual arguments by themselves. The logic and facts are important, but the emotion and personal connection are at least as important.

Storytelling can be very effective in an interview. You can show a hiring manager, very clearly, what you have done in the past. This gives the hiring manager a feeling of what it would be like to work with you. It's this feeling that can tip the scales in your favor and get you hired.

Exercise

Pick the candidate you supported in the election, or do this exercise with both candidates.

On a piece of paper, draw a vertical line down the center of the page. Write the candidate's name at the top of the left column.

Under the candidate's name, list the top three reasons why the candidate should be our next President.

Write a short paragraph, 3-5 sentences, for what you would say to someone that is undecided to persuade them to support the candidate.

At the top of the right column, write your name.

List the top three reasons why you should be hired.

Write a short paragraph, 3-5 sentences, for what you would say to someone that is undecided about hiring you.

Compare the two columns.

  • Which is more specific?
  • Which demonstrates more value to the hiring manager?
  • Which is more personal, giving storytelling examples?
  • What will you change in your resume and next interview?

Assessing Barack Obama’s Job Interview

The Presidential and Vice Presidential debates are a form of job interview and demonstrate interview techniques that can help job seekers. I’m going to review the interview techniques of all four candidates starting with Barack Obama.

The Presidential and Vice Presidential
debates are a form of job interview and demonstrate
interview techniques that can help job seekers.  I’m going
to review the all four candidates.  For this
purpose, I am assessing each candidate based solely on the
content of the first answer they gave in their debate.  I chose the
first answer because it was very predictable – a question about our
current financial crisis – and it is likely the candidates
scripted some or all of their answers.

I am following the order of the
debates.  Barack Obama was the first to answer. The transcript of his answer
is in the gray area to the right.

Obama’s Answer

In this answer, Obama begins by framing
his understanding and empathy for the situation.  He then outlines
his values, impling the actions he will take if hired.  The last two
paragraphs are the core positioning statement that Obama is promoting
in his answer.  He differentiates himself from his competition
and clearly states why he should be President.  Let’s look at these
paragraphs closely.

The first of these two paragraphs attack the economic policies of
his adversary.  He defines these policies as a lack of regulation and
consumer protection, valuing the rich over poor and promoting trickle down
economics. 

In the second paragraph he outlines what makes him different.  He
defines economic success as fairness for the middle class and
reinforces his values by saying this is his motivation for seeking the
Presidency.

Interview Criteria

The first question of a job interview is typically Tell Me About
Yourself.  A successful answer includes the following
characteristics:

  1. Organized clearly and concisely
  2. Focused on the values and needs of the hiring manager and
    company
  3. Reinforces the skill and experience of the job seeker
  4. Separates the job seeker from their competition with a strong
    positioning statement
  5. Backs up the positioning statement with accomplishments that
    demonstrate an ability to succeed
  6. Demonstrates enthusiasm for the job and company

It isn’t entirely fair to judge the candidates on this standard,
since the question wasn’t Tell Me About Yourself.  Despite this, the criteria do very well with the answers the candidates gave.

Obama’s Assessment

Obama’s answer does well on most of the criteria:

  1. The answer is well organized and concise. 
  2. The answer focuses on the needs of the middle class – the targeted "hiring managers."
  3. The answer addresses the skill and experience of the
    candidate by reviewing the four criteria that Obama has proposed for assessing the bailout bill.
  4. The positioning statement is clear in the last two paragraphs
    – Obama will implement greater regulation of the financial markets
    to benefit the middle class.
  5. The candidate does not give an example of an accomplishment
    that demonstrates his ability to succeed. 
  6. The answer clearly states that the candidate wants the job.

If I was coaching this candidate, my advice would be to condense
the content in the second, third and fourth paragraphs, and add an
example of an accomplishment.  The ideal answer would have a very
easy to understand success that directly relates to helping the hiring manager (the middle class) with this type of problem. 

Most job seekers make the same mistake.  They recap their
responsibilities and assume that this demonstrates their
ability to succeed.  A specific example of a time when the job seeker
overcame a similar challenge can be very powerful in an interview and
will usually set the candidate apart for their competition.

Tomorrow, I’m going to review John McCain’s answer to the same
question
.

 

Transcript:

Lehrer:  Gentlemen, at this very moment
tonight, where do you stand on the financial recovery plan?

Obama:  Well, thank you very much, Jim, and thanks to the
commission and the University of Mississippi, "Ole Miss,"
for hosting us tonight. I can’t think of a more important time for us
to talk about the future of the country.

You know, we are at a defining moment in our history. Our nation
is involved in two wars, and we are going through the worst financial
crisis since the Great Depression.

And although we’ve heard a lot about Wall Street, those of you on
Main Street, I think have been struggling for a while, and you
recognize that this could have an impact on all sectors of the
economy.

And you’re wondering, how’s it going to affect me? How’s it going
to affect my job? How’s it going to affect my house? How’s it going
to affect my retirement savings or my ability to send my children to
college?

So we have to move swiftly, and we have to move wisely. And I’ve
put forward a series of proposals that make sure that we protect
taxpayers as we engage in this important rescue effort.

No. 1, we’ve got to make sure that we’ve got oversight over this
whole process; $700 billion, potentially, is a lot of money.

No. 2, we’ve got to make sure that taxpayers, when they are
putting their money at risk, have the possibility of getting that
money back and gains, if the market — and when the market returns.

No. 3, we’ve got to make sure that none of that money is going to
pad CEO bank accounts or to promote golden parachutes.

And, No. 4, we’ve got to make sure that we’re helping homeowners,
because the root problem here has to do with the foreclosures that
are taking place all across the country.

Now, we also have to recognize that this is a final verdict on
eight years of failed economic policies promoted by George Bush,
supported by Senator McCain, a theory that basically says that we can
shred regulations and consumer protections and give more and more to
the most, and somehow prosperity will trickle down.

It hasn’t worked. And I think that the fundamentals of the economy
have to be measured by whether or not the middle class is getting a
fair shake. That’s why I’m running for president, and that’s what I
hope we’re going to be talking about tonight.

Full Transcript of the Debate